This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| mnova_data_processing [2026/05/25 18:06] – [Spectral Resolution] nmr | mnova_data_processing [2026/05/25 18:08] (current) – [Spectral Resolution] nmr | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| This section discusses how you can control resolution in you spectrum after it has been acquired. | This section discusses how you can control resolution in you spectrum after it has been acquired. | ||
| - | I must mention that the best approaches to make your peaks more narrow and better resolved are | + | First, |
| - to use an instrument with the highest magnetic field available to you and | - to use an instrument with the highest magnetic field available to you and | ||
| - pay attention to sample shimming step: the better it is shimmed the narrower the peaks. The next section **Reference Deconvolution** can help remove residual distortions from shimming procedure. | - pay attention to sample shimming step: the better it is shimmed the narrower the peaks. The next section **Reference Deconvolution** can help remove residual distortions from shimming procedure. | ||
| - | Once the dataset has been acquired, it is possible to further increase resolution by giving away some of spectral quality. The peaks may be made more narrow by using **apodization window function** such as **gaussian** or **sin-squared**. The caveat is that you " | + | Once the dataset has been acquired, it is possible to further increase resolution by giving away some of spectral quality. The peaks may be made more narrow by using **apodization window function** such as **gaussian** or **sin-squared**. The caveat is that you " |
| + | |||
| + | Our goal is to strike a balance between resolution (improved enough for your purposes) and sensitivity (degraded to yet a tolerable degree). | ||
| Here are resources you can follow: | Here are resources you can follow: | ||